← Home
Watch ItInteresting, not yet provenLLM ServingMLOps

How To Build Your Own LLM Runtime From Scratch

Jul 27, 2026via Towards Data Science

Why it matters

If you're considering building a custom LLM runtime, be prepared for significant operational challenges and unknown performance characteristics. Established frameworks may offer more reliability and community support than a prototype like this.

Summary

The article provides a guide to building a custom LLM inference runtime, annotated-llm-runtime, on NVIDIA's H100 GPU. It focuses on packing weights and managing CUDA graphs, while discussing three specific bugs encountered. The runtime is a prototype, lacking performance benchmarks and scalability insights.

Editor's Take

Building your own LLM runtime? That's a heavy lift, even for seasoned engineers. The journey described here with the annotated-llm-runtime on an H100 GPU is intriguing but comes with significant caveats. First, it’s a prototype. That means you’re not just facing the usual debugging headaches but also the sheer unpredictability of performance and scalability. Before pouring effort into this, consider how it stacks against established frameworks like Hugging Face Transformers or NVIDIA Triton Inference Server. These aren't just marketing tools; they come with robust communities and battle-tested features.

What they're not saying: while the article outlines the process of packing weights and managing CUDA graphs, it falls short of addressing real-world operational overhead. You'll want to know how this runtime performs under load, not just in controlled conditions. Is it efficient enough to justify the time investment? How does it handle scaling, especially as your user base grows? These are the questions that should linger in your mind.

Who benefits here? If you're a data engineer with a strong grasp of CUDA and a specific need for customization that existing solutions can't meet, you might find this project worthwhile. But be ready for the learning curve. If your team is already using something like TensorFlow Serving or Triton, this could be a distraction more than a solution.

Here’s the thing: if you’re itching to experiment or have a unique use case that demands this level of control, maybe dive in. But if you’re looking for a quick path to reliable LLM deployment, it’s probably best to stick with what’s already proven in production environments. The risk of adding a custom runtime to your stack might outweigh the potential benefits right now.

Reactions & Discussion

Enjoyed this?

Get it every Tuesday — free.

Curated AI/ML data engineering news. No hype. Unsubscribe anytime.